Best Cartoons Growing up III

Tweet

Insert everything about the 90s was great caption here

For this edition of 'Best Cartoons' we turn away from animation to live action, with real actors and real props. If you have not guessed from the above picture, today I will take a nostalgic look back at the Mighty Morphin' Power Rangers.

Man, when I was a kid I could not wait to be up at 8am (for some reason the best cartoons were from 8-10, never knew why) on Saturday morning (amazing how times have changed) to watch this show. Fighting? check. Giant Robots? check. Cool weapons? just look above. Yes, the show was very cheesy, and I get that the plot was kind of repetitive and that the animation of the robots was not the best, but you know what? Who cares? As a kid I never noticed any of those things, the show was fun to watch and that is all that mattered. I wont go as far to say that the 90's edition was the best one, because all of the Power Rangers shows are pretty similar. What the 90's version has on the others is the fact that it is the most memorable and was the first show of its kind. So if you have a moment, hop onto You-tube and re-live your childhood for a bit. Let's be honest, you are procrastinating anyways, why not do it right?

Mid-Season NBA Awards

Tweet

Remember when I did my 1/4 season overview? Feels like yesterday. As promised, here is the second quarter of my awards, again, I realize many writers have done this gimmick and I am not trying to copy them, I just think it's a lot of fun to do.

The Jason Vorhees Award: To the team that everyone always thinks is dead but always manages to come back (like Jason in his movies): The San Antonio Spurs! Right now if you picked up 2k12 and tried to play with them you would lose, even if all of the sliders were in your favor (trust me on this). Even at the beginning of the season, many analysts and fans picked them to finally wither away into obscurity, yet here they are, 2nd in the very tough western conference. To top it off they have gotten here without Ginobili, who is arguably their best scorer next to Parker. I for one, will never write them off until Pop' retires; if the season ended today he would be the coach of the year.

The Pau Gasol Award: to the player who most needs to be traded, goes to none other then Pau himself. I am actually amazed that the Lakers are still playing at a decent level considering that Gasol is not himself at all. Am I crazy or is it possible for them to win the title with their current squad? Gasol has given them a "C" so far this year, if he can get over the trade rumors and start giving them A's. the Lakers could actually contend. What a weird season. I will also call out the Suns here, for the sake of fairness: FREE STEVE NASH. The man is too much of a class act to demand a trade, but that does not mean he wants to play for your awful team. Do everyone a favor and trade him to a contender.

The Red Cross Award: To the team that needs to get healthy as soon as possible goes to the Bulls. I mean, they are somehow right there at the top of their conference despite missing Rose and Hamilton for at least half of their games. In Millennium's power rankings (which will go up soon) I ranked them first with my vote because I think that a healthy Bulls team can make the finals. Their major issue right now is health and if they can get healthy in time for the playoffs they will be scary. I firmly believe this.

The Goku Award: Given to the player who came at the perfect time to save his team, can only go to Jeremy Lin. The Knicks were done, dead, then Lin showed up and JR Smith decided to sign with them. Would you want your team to play these guys in the playoffs? I thought so. Look for them to peak when they get healthy.

The Groundhog's day award: Miami Heat. I am so sick and tired of everyone saying that these guys will easily win the title. Hey, newsflash! this was the same F****** thing that everyone said last year! I will not be sold on these guys until they actually win the title. Having said that, Lebron, WOW, just give him the MVP right now, he is having an unreal season.

The "do not sleep on us award": Memphis Grizzles. If they can incorporate Randolph (who is back from injury very soon) into their team without chemistry issues watch out! As I have said before, they were a 3OT loss away from playing against Dallas in the WCF last year. This year they are in the middle of the tight West playoff race, only they have done it without their best players. Is it too much to see Memphis pulling off a deep playoff run? We shall see.

Awards:

Coach of the year: Gregg Popovich and Lionel Hollins

MVP: Lebron James

ROY: Ricky Rubio

6th man: James Harden

Defensive Player of the year: Tony Allen. At this point, I think he could shut any perimeter player in the league.

I realize that there are many more stories left uncovered, and I promise that we will get to them. This is just the appetizer.

2012 Oscars - Predictions and Possible Spoilers

Tweet

The 2012 Oscars are going to be fairly predictable in some of the most important categories. However, you wouldn’t be safe betting on the Best Actor/Actress categories this year, as there has been a change of opinion during the awards season. My predictions for the winners and possible spoilers are below.

Best Motion Picture of the Year

Nominees: The Artist, The Descendants, Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close, The Help, Hugo, Midnight in Paris, Moneyball, The Tree of Life, War Horse

Winner: The Artist. It’s won just about every single possible best picture award during the awards season, and there’s nothing stopping it from nabbing the Oscar. I don’t know how close this race will be, but you might as well put all your money on The Artist because nothing else has much of a chance at winning.

Spoiler: Hugo or The Help, but each with a < 5% chance of winning.

Best Performance by an Actor in a Leading Role

Nominees: Demián Bichir for A Better Life, George Clooney for The Descendants, Jean Dujardin for The Artist, Gary Oldman for Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy, Brad Pitt for Moneyball

Winner: Jean Dujardin. Up until the SAG awards, Clooney was a lock for best actor. Everyone was praising his performance, he won the Golden Globe, and then Dujardin ended up getting the SAG and the BAFTA. A lot of the SAG voters are also members of the Academy, so Dujardin definitely has the advantage heading into Oscar night.

Spoiler: George Clooney would be the spoiler now.

Best Performance by an Actress in a Leading Role

Nominees: Glenn Close for Albert Nobbs, Viola Davis for The Help, Rooney Mara for The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo, Meryl Streep for The Iron Lady, Michelle Williams for My Week with Marilyn

Winner: Viola Davis. This race is wildly close. Davis was supposed to win at the Golden Globes, but Streep took the award home. Streep also recently won the BAFTA, but with a win at the SAG Awards, and most people still talking about her performance in The Help, Davis has the slight advantage.

Spoiler: Meryl Streep. Don’t be surprised if she wins. It’s literally that close.

Best Performance by an Actor in a Supporting Role

Nominees: Kenneth Branagh for My Week with Marilyn, Jonah Hill for Moneyball, Nick Nolte for Warrior, Christopher Plummer for Beginners, Max von Sydow for Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close

Winner: Christopher Plummer. He’s won every supporting actor nomination he’s gotten.

Spoiler: None.

Best Performance by an Actress in a Supporting Role

Nominees: Bérénice Bejo for The Artist, Jessica Chastain for The Help, Melissa McCarthy for Bridesmaids, Janet McTeer for Albert Nobbs, Octavia Spencer for The Help

Winner: Octavia Spencer. She’s been just as stellar as Plummer during the awards season.

Spoiler: None.

Best Achievement in Directing

Nominees: Woody Allen for Midnight in Paris, Michel Hazanavicius for The Artist, Terrence Malick for The Tree of Life, Alexander Payne for The Descendants, Martin Scorsese for Hugo

Winner: Michel Hazanavicius. Since this award typically goes to the director of the best picture, Hazanavicius is a safe bet (plus he won the DGA). Scorsese may have won the Globe, but as we all know, the Globes don’t really matter. Remember how David Fincher won at the Globes for The Social Network, but then lost the DGA and the Oscar to Hooper for The King’s Speech?

Spoiler: Martin Scorsese. Hugo has received amazing critiques, but it will be nearly impossible for Scorsese to win this one after losing the DGA.

Best Writing, Screenplay Written Directly for the Screen (Original Screenplay)

Nominees: The Artist, Bridesmaids, Margin Call, Midnight in Paris, A Separation

Winner: Midnight in Paris. I would have gone with The Artist because it’s going to win Best Picture, but Midnight in Paris has been the favorite in this category since before the Golden Globes. It hasn’t lost any momentum and it should win the Oscar. Plus the script is excellent.

Spoiler: The Artist. It’s going to be the spoiler for the majority of categories it doesn’t win.

Best Writing, Screenplay Based on Material Previously Produced or Published (Adapted Screenplay)

Nominees: The Descendants, Hugo, The Ides of March, Moneyball, Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy

Winner: The Descendants. Of the nominated films, it’s the best one. Moneyball also had a terrific script, but critics have been heavily favoring The Descendants. It won the Golden Globe, and most well-made movies that deal with dysfunctional families will be recognized for their scripts.

Spoiler: Moneyball. I know Hugo received the majority of nominations and I still have yet to predict a win for it, but the script for Moneyball is better and it’s the only movie that has a chance of beating The Descendants.

Best Animated Feature Film of the Year

Nominees: A Cat in Paris, Chico & Rita, Kung Fu Panda 2, Puss in Boots, Rango

Winner: Rango. It received the best ratings of the American films that have been nominated. I don’t know much about the two foreign films, but the Academy has been known to acknowledge them in the past (Spirited Away won in 2002 over four American films, and Howl’s Moving Castle was nominated in 2005, but it did not win). However, I still believe the majority of voters will go with Rango.

Spoiler: One of the two foreign films. Panda and Puss are not winning.

Best Foreign Language Film of the Year

Nominees: Bullhead, Footnote, In Darkness, Monsieur Lazhar, A Separation

Winner: A Separation. I don’t really know these films, but A Separation won the Golden Globe and it’s also the only one of these films nominated for another Oscar (Best Writing), so I would expect it to win the Best Doc Feature at the Oscars as well.

Spoiler: I couldn’t tell you, but there’s little chance of another film winning.

Best Achievement in Cinematography

Nominees: The Artist, The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo, Hugo, The Tree of Life, War Horse

Winner: The Tree of Life. I’m a bit skeptic on this one because True Grit was supposed to be the winner last year, yet it lost to Inception. I wouldn’t put any money on this category because it’s unpredictable. The Artist and Hugo could just as easily win.

Spoiler: The Artist. Hugo is a prettier movie, but if Academy voters are mesmerized with the old look of the film, they might hand the award to The Artist. It won the BAFTA, but the BAFTAs don’t have a lot of relation with the Oscars.

Best Achievement in Editing

Nominees: The Artist, The Descendants, The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo, Hugo, Moneyball

Winner: The Artist. The award typically goes hand-in-hand with the Best Picture category. As a result, The Artist is the clear frontrunner. The film is edited very well, and it a nice piece of cinema that all audiences should check out.

Spoiler: Hugo. I was about to put none, but Hugo is just as terrific as The Artist, and even though there’s little probability of it winning, it will definitely get some votes from the Academy members.

Best Achievement in Art Direction

Nominees: The Artist, Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2, Hugo, Midnight in Paris, War Horse

Winner: Hugo. Art direction awards the production set designer and the set decorator, so I would expect Hugo to win because it has the best set of all of the nominated films. There is great detail in every scene and the movie looks beautiful.

Spoiler: None. The Artist might get some votes, but Hugo deserves to win this, and it probably will.

Best Achievement in Costume Design

Nominees: Anonymous, The Artist, Hugo, Jane Eyre, W.E.

Winner: The Artist. I have only seen The Artist and Hugo, but I believe the Academy will award the costumes from the late 1920s. It seems like unless a film has costumes that are different from what people wear today, it won’t have a shot at winning. Also, The Artist won the BAFTA.

Spoiler: I guess I’ll go with Hugo, but I’m not sure.

Best Achievement in Makeup

Nominees: Albert Nobbs, Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2, The Iron Lady

Winner: The Iron Lady. They managed to make Meryl Streep look like Margaret Thatcher and I’m not sure who looks worse. However, the makeup was done very well and the Academy will probably side with the BAFTA voters on this one.

Spoiler: Harry Potter. Not much competition, but I don’t expect Albert Nobbs to win this one.

Best Achievement in Music Written for Motion Pictures, Original Score

Nominees: The Adventures of Tintin, The Artist, Hugo, Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy, War Horse

Winner: The Artist. It has the best music hands down out of all these nominees. You’re practically listening to the score for all of the film’s 90 minutes. Besides that, it’s won numerous times for Best Score and there’s nothing that will take the Oscar away from it.

Spoiler: None.

Best Achievement in Music Written for Motion Pictures, Original Song

Nominees: Bret McKenzie ("Man or Muppet") for The Muppets, Sergio Mendes, Carlinhos Brown, Siedah Garrett ("Real in Rio") for Rio

Winner: Man or Muppet. It’s the better song, and it’s surprising that the Academy did not nominate more Muppets songs (the Golden Globes nominated three).

Spoiler: I wonder…

Best Achievement in Sound Mixing

Nominees: The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo, Hugo, Moneyball, Transformers: Dark of the Moon, War Horse

Winner: Hugo. I don’t know how you judge either of the sound categories. For the mixing of sound, I’ll go with Hugo just because it appears to be the favorite, but again, I don’t know how to judge it.

Spoiler: The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo. Just a guess.

Best Achievement in Sound Editing
Nominees: Drive, The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo, Hugo, Transformers: Dark of the Moon, War Horse

Winner: Hugo. Sound editing is the creation of sound. It’s basically noise. Transformers is probably the best in this category, in my opinion, but the Academy isn’t going to give it any awards, and Hugo is the favorite.

Spoiler: The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo. Again, it’s just a guess.

Best Achievement in Visual Effects

Nominees: Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2, Hugo, Real Steel, Rise of the Planet of the Apes, Transformers: Dark of the Moon

Winner: Rise of the Planet of the Apes. The CGI in the film was amazing, and even though the Academy failed to recognize the brilliance in Andy Serkis’ performance as Caesar, they should and they probably will award the Oscar to Planet of the Apes.

Spoiler: Harry Potter. It won the BAFTA, but the CGI in Planet of the Apes is just too good for the Academy to not give it the award.

The Last 4 categories (Best Documentary, Feature and Short Subjects, and Best Short Film, Live Action and Animated) would be blind guesses since I have not seen any of them, so I cannot give an accurate prediction as to who will win those categories.

2012 NBA Rising Stars Challenge Draft

Tweet

This year the NBA changed its annual Rookie-Sophomore game into a "Rising Stars Challenge" where a pool of players would be picked playground style by two "coaches", Shaquille O'neal and Charles Barkley. It was a way to generate some more excitement to an event that's been an afterthought to each All-Star weekend. Fellow writer Igor suggested that we use this opportunity to fill the roles of Shaq and Charles and draft the players ourselves. Obviously i agreed right away and this is what we came up with. Igor won the coin toss and will be in charge of Team Shaq while I am Team Barkley.

Shortly after this was written the NBA added Jeremy Lin and Norris Cole to the roster of available players. Since Igor got the first pick in the actual draft I will be getting it in this supplemental one. And with it I'm taking LINSANITY. Igor will take (be stuck with) Norris Cole.

Igor

With the first pick in the draft I'm going to take Jeremy Lin...ok I'm kidding he's not available but they should somehow include him. Anyways, I'm going to pick the best player (and only allstar) from the field of rookies and sophomores. I wonder who that is? You guessed it! Blake Griffin! His game is built for all-star weekend and he's bound to supply ESPN with a bunch of highlights from this game as well as from Sunday's game. As long as there's no hack-a-Blake he should thrive on Friday night. Side note: It's kind of sad that he's not in the dunk contest this year since the field looks pretty weak and apparently it will be 3 dunks per player where the winner will be determined by fan voting...terrible decision by the NBA.

Luka

I find it amazing how the NBA keeps managing to make the slam-dunk contest worse year after year. If I'm them I just go all the way this year and make the contestants Brian Scalabrine, Luis Scola, Aaron Gray and Gregg Ostertag (he can come out of retirement for this). Who wouldn't watch this? (Everybody). For my pick I'm taking the most exciting point guard from a passing point in the roster of available players.. Ricky Rubio! He's had an amazing year so far (way better than I thought he'd have) and you need a pass-first point guard running the show in any type of all-star game. Also, if you don't think my team is playing Hack-a-Blake then something's wrong with you.

Igor

Yeah, do your Hack-a-Blake and ruin the game for everyone (F you Don Nelson...F you!). That dunk contest would be awesome, but sub in Big Baby instead of Scola. After watching him get stuffed by the rim last year I have my doubts whether he could dunk or not. Good pick with Rubio, but I'm taking the best PG from the pool of players, John Wall. Wall is going to connect with Blake for at least 5 alley-oops and he can also turn it on by being a scorer whenever the team needs him to be. He's increased his assist totals in the last month finally showing us he's the player we were expecting him to be. Wall will finish this game with at least 15 assists.

Luka

Good pick. I think Wall won't want to take off his jersey from this game because for two wonderful hours he won't be a Washington Wizard. With my second pick I'm going to take DeMarcus Cousins who I can see having a monster 20 point 20 rebound game with at least 5 plays that make you say "that guy knows he's getting paid to play a sport right..?". It'll also be nice to see Cousins play with a real point guard (sorry Tyreke).

Igor

If Blair can get 20-20 a few years ago, Cousins probably can too. Next I'm going with less athleticism and more skill and pick Greg Monroe. This guy is one of the more skilled big man passers in the NBA today and is having a beast year overall. As happy as Wall will be without a Wiz jersey, Monroe will be equally as happy without a Pistons jersey. This locks up my starting frontcourt.

Luka

Really like Monroe. Wish he didn't play for a team that seems like they're inventing new ways of losing each night. I'm going to take Paul George with my third pick. He can shoot the three, can catch an alley-oop from Rubio and finish and should be rewarded for having a great second year while playing big minutes for a legit playoff team.

Igor

Well George is in the dunk contest so he could give us a tease as to what he's going to do on Saturday. Kobe Bryant Jr. is my next pick. MarShon Brooks has really impressed me this year with his scoring and passing abilities. His jumper looks like Kobe's and he can explode on any given night (hopefully does for this game). The kid really knows how to play smart basketball and even though he's been slightly sub-par recently (he was injured), I think he will be in form for this game.

Luka

Like most of the New Jersey Nets (other than D-Will who should not be an all-star) I don't really have a strong opinion on Brooks but he's a scorer and in a game of no defense that's always a good thing. I'm taking Kyrie Irving. The current favorite for the rookie of the year award has (just like Rubio) exceeded expectations and has made the Cavs watchable. I don't care that I have 2 point guards now since position doesn't matter in this game and I'm more than willing to go to war (or in this case, a half-hearted battle) with a Rubio-Irving backcourt.

Igor

Irving has greatly exceeded my expectations, I mean he's shooting 50% from the field, 40% from three and 80% from the line. Only a few others are as efficient as him and this is especially impressive since he's a rookie point guard. Now the talent drops off a little bit so I'm going to add in some defense. Landry Fields is my next pick and I think he fits well on this team. He can shoot the three, rebound well for a guard, and I believe he can defend Paul George. Not to make things boring, he also has some hops so expect him to finish a few alley-oops from Wall.

Luka

Fields has been completely rejuvenated by Lin (who hasn't) and is a solid player. To counter I'm going to take Gordon Hayward because he's a shooter who will get plenty of open looks this game and for the unintentional comedy that we'll get from him playing with Cousins. Side-note: anyone who gets drafted by Shaq has already lost. They'll have to spend the entire game pretending to laugh at his labored, bad jokes. I mean has there ever been a case of someone who everyone thought would be good at a certain position (in this case Shaq as a studio guy) only to be terrible at it? (Cut to everyone who voted for Obama trying not to nod (just kidding)).

Lin-sanity Rolls On

Tweet

Perhaps one of our contributors said it best on Twitter.

Please note that this article was not planned, but it had to be written after tonight's incredible ending between the Knicks and the Raptors. However, the content will not be purely about Jeremy Lin, as something else is happening that has been just as fun to watch. Let me begin by saying that I am fully a part of the stampede to get a spot on the Lin band-wagon (at this point, you'l get into the white house faster), how often can we get the chance to cheer for a guy who comes absolutely out of nowhere and who had been abandoned by two teams already. I'll tell you: not often. The Knicks are 6-0 since he started getting play-time, with the teams two stars, Carmelo and Amar'e, missing 5 of those games (and Melo' all 6). During that stretch Lin has managed to best another up-and-coming PG (Rubio), out-duel Kobe Bryant, and sink a game winning three with less then a second to go in a game.

But none of those accomplishments compare to his best one of all: making the Knicks a real team. Before Lin's arrival, this team was abysmal to watch  (whether that was because they lacked a true point-guard or because Amar'e and Melo' cannot coexist remains to be seen), they played slow, they played selfish, and they played a very ugly brand of basketball. So how exactly did Lin change all of this? Probably through a combination of the D'antoni system, which we know thrives with smart point-guards, and the Knicks role-players realizing that they would now be rewarded for their dirty work. The beauty of a good point-guard is that he is able to keep every player happy. Whether its through the occasional lob to Chandler, a kick-out to Fields, or feeding Shumpert on the break, it makes a difference. Suddenly, Chandler is crashing the boards and playing more ferocious defense, Landry Fields starts making smarter decisions, and Shumpert decides to lock-down the opponents best player (the job he did on Calderon tonight was awe-inspiring). With all due respect to Melo', who is a great player, he simply can't make everyone else happy like Jeremy Lin can. He simply lacks that gene that all great passers have, and he is much better when he is allowed to focus on what he excels at (scoring). Will Melo' struggle playing with Lin? Probably not, because I firmly believe that Lin will be able to keep both the stars and the role-players involved enough to keep the Knicks playing at a high (and beautiful to watch) level.

In this crazy NBA season we were waiting for that random guy to explode on to the scene and surprise everyone (it happens every year), and make no mistake that Lin is that guy. What we were not waiting for, was that same random guy to potentially swing the East. I say potentially because we have to see how the Knicks will play when everyone is healthy. But a team with two stars, great defenders who are embracing their roles and are offering something offensively (Chandler, Fields, Shumpert), a true play maker (the guy this article is about), and veteran locker-room leadership (Bibby, don't laugh) is a contender by any measure. I have not even mentioned the ultimate wild-cards: Baron Davis and the return of Wilson Chandler and JR Smith from China. With a little bit of luck in the form of a signing, and the 'good' version of Baron Davis in addition to the team the Knicks now have, I mean, anything is possible right? Not only has Jeremy Lin become the star of the season, he has also brought hope to the Mecca of basketball. That might be his greatest accomplishment when it is all said and done.

NBA 2012 All-Star Reserves

Tweet

Last week the 2012 NBA all-star starters were announced for the game in Orlando on February 26^th. Without much surprise the East consisted of LeBron James and Carmelo Anthony at the forward spots, Dwyane Wade and Derrick Rose as the guards, and Dwight Howard at center. The West starters selected were Kobe Bryant, Chris Paul, Kevin Durant, Blake Griffin, and Andrew Bynum (first appearance). Now that the fan voting is done the all-star reserves get to be selected with the official announcement tomorrow. I’m going to give a list of the players who I think should be selected and why they deserve to play in the 2012 all-star game.

Eastern Conference Reserves

PG – Rajon Rondo: He’s the third best point guard in the east, but the second best on a winning team and is the leader of the Celtics (it shouldn’t be the big 3, it should be Rondo, Pierce and friends) so he certainly deserves a spot in the all-star game.

SG/SF – Andre Iguodala: The Philadelphia 76ers are one of the best teams in the league and give teams problems with their lock-down defense. Since someone from this team deserves an all-star selection, why not choose the 76ers leader on both ends of the floor. His scoring numbers may not look flashy, but Iguodala has been one of the best wing defenders in the league for a few years and contributes to his team’s offense with smart ball movement. He’s definitely playing like an all-star in my eyes this year.

SG/SF – Joe Johnson: The Hawks have surprised me this season since I thought they would plummet in the standings (especially after the Horford injury) but they have kept it together with the leadership of Joe Johnson. His numbers are about the same as last year but he has taken that leader role and has done a great job so far, as indicated by the Hawks record.

SF – Luol Deng: If the NBA rewards winning with all-star appearances then the Bulls should have 2 all-stars. Deng has been the second best player on the Bulls for the last few years (since Rose stepped in as the franchise player) and finally deserves some recognition for his hard work.

SF – Paul Pierce: Pierce is playing like his usual all-star self, meaning he’s destined to go to Orlando in a few weeks. The Celtics have struggled (especially due to injuries) but Pierce has stepped it up recently, especially when he led the whole team while Rondo was out by averaging 7 assists per game.

PF – Chris Bosh: Bosh was on a tear while Wade was out and gave us glimpses of his days as a Raptor. His scoring numbers have increased from last year and it also helps that his team stands 2^nd in the East.

C – Roy Hibbert: Indiana deserves a player in the all-star game, the only problem is who to pick. It’s really tough picking a player on such a well balanced team, so let’s go through the starters. Granger (the “franchise” player) has been shooting the ball poorly this year and is not looking like the leader on this team. George and Collison have both been solid, but not all-star worthy and West is nowhere near his old all-star form. I have to go with Hibbert since he’s been a dominant force on offense and defense. He’s averaging career highs in points, rebounds, blocks, and field goal percentage and is the second best center in the East. I think he should be a lock as an all-star and hopefully the GMs think the same way.

Western Conference Reserves

PG – Russell Westbrook: He is a top 6 point guard who is on the 2^nd best team in the league so I don’t think much needs to be said here. Side note: He can finally play shooting guard (his natural position).

PG – Tony Parker: Parker has really impressed me this year with his overall play. He has increased his scoring from last year and is averaging a career high in assists (career high after 10 years in the league!?). I believe he’s the best player on the Spurs right now who sit comfortably in 2^nd in the West. Duncan’s best days are over (averaging career lows in almost everything) so Parker should be representing the Spurs at the all-star game this year.

PG – Ty Lawson: The Denver Nuggets offense has been fun and exciting to watch, which is run by a 5’11 (he’s probably 5’9) point guard by the name of Ty Lawson. Lawson has been excellent this year and has raised his numbers across the board. He should get a free trip to Orlando to showcase his talent with the success he and his team are having. I would have considered putting Gallinari here but he’s likely out for 3-4 weeks.

PF – Paul Millsap: The Jazz have been surprisingly good this year (they were 2^nd in the West at one point) mostly due to their front court due of Millsap and Al Jefferson. Both of these guys are worthy of a spot but I would have to go with Millsap. Statistically they are about equal but Millsap brings up the energy level of the entire team with his hustle (3.3 o.reb/game) and hard work.

PF – Kevin Love: 25 and 14…enough said.

PF/C – LaMarcus Aldridge: Aldridge elevated his game to an all-star level last year, but was unfortunate to be the last cut in the West. This year he’s averaging 2 more points and is leading the Blazers to the playoffs. If 24 and 9 with a good team record isn’t enough for a trip to Orlando then I don’t know what is.

C – Marc Gasol: Gasol makes his 4^th all star game…wait Marc Gasol…what?? Yes, Marc Gasol has been the best center in the West this year (and has outplayed his brother) averaging career highs in points (15), rebounds (10), assists (2.7), and blocks (2.2). He has picked up the slack when Randolph went down with a knee injury and has emerged as the Grizzlies MVP. He has earned his spot in the all-star game. Side note: Hey Pau, at least one Gasol will be participating in the game!

Best Cartoons Growing up II

Tweet

I think enough time has passed since our last look at old-school cartoons (which you can read up on here) that we can look at another one. After wasting (worth it) at least 30 minutes on YouTube trying to find which cartoon I would write about, I settled on two. The first one will be Disney's Filmore, and the second one will be Doug.

The premise of Filmore is simple enough: A middle school is treated like real life (think CSI for kids) with ace hall-monitor Filmore in charge of preventing students from various 'criminal offenses' (handing out test answers, sabotaging pep rallies, stealing school projects). Of course, it is never that easy. Filmore has to find a balance between justice and what the politics of the school dictate (the politicians being the principal and the "chief" of the student police). Look, I could talk on and on about how great this show was, but if you clicked the video above ask yourself this: How can a show be bad with an intro like that? The best part is that You Tube has the episodes, so they are not difficult to watch from time to time and get that great feeling of being a kid again. You know, before words such as: tutorial, mid-term, lecture slides, and professor ever existed. Anyways, the show is always watchable and I know that if you watched it as a kid you will have a blast watching it again. If you were unlucky enough not to have seen this, I guarantee you will appreciate the intelligent way in which kids cartoons used to be made. It goes without say that if this came back on TV with new episodes, I would watch.

I almost forgot how good this show was until I watched a few episodes again. Instead of telling you what the show is about, I will let you figure that out from the opening intro. Again, if you did not watch this as a kid, its not too late to see what you missed out on. Anyways, check back often for more nostalgia such as this. Also we have a twitter account! Follow us @MillenniumSandE. cheers!

The Winners and Losers from the Super Bowl

Tweet Obviously we know that the Giants won and the Patriots lost, Cabrock will have a recap of that up shortly. In the mean time, here are some additional winners and losers from last night.

Winners: Tom Coughlin and Eli Manning

From a historical standpoint, these guys are now both locks for the hall-of-fame and even have an aura of invincibility in big games now. This was truly a masterful season of coaching from Couglin; whose team basically played 5 straight playoff games (remember: they were 7-7 and almost missed out at one point). As for Eli, he holds both the "toughest QB in the game" mantle, as well as the "Most clutch QB in the game" one. No one player has ever increased his legacy so vastly in one season of play.

Losers: Deion Branch, Wes Welker, Aron Hernandez

These guys spent the entire season making routine (and moderately difficult) catches, en-route to another Super Bowl appearance... only to drop crucial catches at the worst possible time (I think I will call this the Asante Samuel disease that he apparently infected the Patriots locker room with). Even Giselle Bundchen (a.k.a. Mrs. Tom Brady) called these guys out: "My husband can't throw and catch the ball at the same time!" Ouch.

Winners: Mario Manningham

Had the catch of the game, with a myriad of other tough snags, and provided Eli with an outlet throughout the game. Brilliant performance from him.

Winners: Tom Brady

Say what you will about the man, he made all of the plays he had to, including a near completion on the Hail-Mary. At one point in the game he completed 16 passes in a row, his one mistake was having the guile to throw a jump-ball between the best tight-end in football and a line-backer. Side note: Gronkowski was not the same player last night, the Patriots might have been better off not playing him at all. Anyways, the only thing you need to know about Brady is this: When Bradshaw ran in (stupidly) for the 'reluctant' touchdown, a vivid Cabrock Jones jumped off the couch (he was cheering for the Giants) and provided us with this gem: "NOOOOO, you IDIOT, NOOO" When our horrified friend Marko (a non-football fan) asked him why the hell he was upset with a touchdown, Cabrock response was priceless: "Because Tom Fu***** Terrific is an A** You dont understand that he will win this now!". Our boy Cabrock dishes out the hate, but it was really nice seeing him showing Brady respect, even if it was in a fit of rage.

Winners: The Waterloo crew

Threw a great weekend for the Superbowl, good job guys!

Loser: Ahmad Bradshaw

If Branch and Hernandez caught those passes and the patriots went on to win, he would be looked at as the guy who made the worst play of all time. The Giants should have just knelt it and not allowed for a mistake like that to happen.

Loser: The NFL rule-book

With the Patriots desperately trying to mount a game winning drive, the Giants placed 12-men on the field (probably by accident). This allowed them to get a stop, while time ran down, so how were they punished? A measly 5-yards was awarded to the Patriots. You may not think that this is a big deal, but just wait until next year when Belichick starts throwing out 16 players on defense and wins a game because the penalty is so insignificant compared to the advantage the defense gains.

That's it from me, hit us up later in the day for Cabrock's take

The Sad Case of the Memphis Grizzlies

Tweet

Earlier this season when Zach Randolph went down in a heap with, what turned out to be a torn MCL, the first two words I thought of were: Chris and Webber. Why the hell would I think of him? Because this Memphis squad reminds me a lot of the old Kings teams, and how a little bit of bad luck can ruin an opportunity to win a title. If we were to compare this version of Memphis with that version of Sacramento we would see some similarities. The defensive prowess of Tony Allen and Doug Christie, the bench impact of O.J. Mayo and Bobby Jackson, the passing skill of Divac (a big man from Europe) and Gasol (a big man from Europe), and of course; a star power-forward with a good inside-out game who struggled before finding the right team (for Webber it was Sacramento, for Randolph it was Memphis). Obviously there are differences as well: Conely and Rudy Gay are vastly different then Bibby and Stojakovic but the fact remains that (when healthy) both teams had arguably the best starting five's in the league. Notice I did not say best player (LeBron) or best one-two punch (Durant/Westbrook), but F-I-V-E, Memphis has arguably the best combination of players and a sixth-man in the league. But their inherent problem has not been choking (they have several players who can hit big shots), or lack of talent (see above) it has been bad luck (refer to the word in bold above).


Last season, Memphis came out of the gate struggling, but as the season progressed it became clear that this team was a lot better then people thought. Once everything started to click (the Grizzlies had a 12-3 record in the period of Jan 21 - Feb 21 of last season) it seemed like this could be a team to contend. Then Rudy Gay was proclaimed out for the year. Memphis still finished the season on a decent 15-10 run but could only muster an eight seed. We all know what happened next, they thoroughly outplayed San Antonio and only a 3OT loss in game 5 to OKC on the road could stop them. Does a healthy Rudy Gay make the difference for that team? Could the 2011 Grizzlies have won the title if they stayed healthy? One could certainly argue that they would have had a much better chance, just like the 02' Kings (Peja-ankle), 03' Kings (Webber-knee) and 04' Kings (Jackson-abdomen) probably would have. Which is exactly why I was so disappointed when Zach Randolph was injured. Although news has come out that he has progressed fantastically and will not be done for the year (as coach Hollins told SI the other day) will this Memphis team that had no training camp (lockout be damned), and few prolonged stretches of playing together be able to get things together for a title run? If last year's Mavericks squad taught us anything its that defense, teamwork, and execution down the stretch go a long way towards winning. Memphis can do all of those things, whether they will catch a few breaks remains to be seen.

A team gets very few opportunities to win a title before the window closes. Having seen that happen to my favorite team, i hate seeing it happen to a team that is so similar. Here is hoping that Memphis can pull it together and take their chance before time runs out on them.